The Goodis Center

advancing & protecting human rights

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
      • Our Commitment to Transparency
    • Staff and Directors
    • Get Involved
      • More Information about Internships
    • Support Our Programs
  • Our Projects
    • Overview of Our Projects
    • Journal for Human Advancement
      • Call for Submissions
      • Submission Guidelines
      • Archives
  • News and Reports
    • News and Reports
      • Full Reports and Essays
    • Syndicated Content
  • Services & Products
    • Services & Products
    • Save Darfur Yarmulkes
  • Resources & Links
  • Contact Us

News and Reports

The content on this page comes from contributors and from Goodis Center staff, interns, and volunteers.  The Goodis Center will also occasionally publish press releases—both our own and those from other organizations and agencies—here.

For full reports and essays related to The Goodis Center’s research, please view this archive.

Notice:
We are in the process of updating our website to add older content to our archives, and we are preparing to resume publishing new content in the summer of 2015.  Please continue to check back for updates.


In addition to the content published directly on our site, The Goodis Center syndicates headlines from other content providers.  Please check out our Syndicated Content category to browse headlines.


 

“When Texas Executes One” : Occupy Wall Street and the Effects of Corporate Personhood

November 4, 2011 By Megan Towey 1 Comment

The extension of rights, privileges, and power under the mask of “corporate personhood” and its inherent application of the equal protection clause has turned industries into collections of Frankenstein’s monsters on track to devour their creators. In the midst of economic turbulence, demonstrators at Occupy Wall Street and around the globe have taken issue with the trend wherein corporate personhood extends rights traditionally reserved for natural persons to corporations, often without imposing the same standards of accountability traditionally applied to natural persons. But what exactly are “corporate personhood” and the rights granted by it? And to what extent can a corporation be held accountable for its actions? The answer to this question is soon to come.

The Supreme Court has recently agreed to hear the Kiobel vs. Royal Dutch Petroleum (Shell)case, which will determine whether or not corporations can be held responsible for human rights violations overseas. This case involves the Ogoni people of Nigeria who, after demanding an end to the oil development that was destroying their region, were tortured and executed by Shell in collusion with the Nigerian government. Now, if Shell is found to be liable, corporations will have a new layer of responsibility, further completing their status as persons.

But rather than to delve into a discussion on morality in the post-industrial age, let’s consider the history of corporate personhood and how it came to be. In the 1886 Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad case regarding the taxation of corporations, the Supreme Court declared that corporations can be considered persons under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. But more relevant and problematic to the Occupy protesters is the 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision, which gave corporations the right to give exorbitant funds to political campaigns without disclosure. The Citizens United case overturned the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, which prohibited corporations from “electioneering” – driving politics with corporate funding, asserting that the Campaign Reform Act was a violation of the First Amendment rights of corporations. Strengthening the corporatocratic  behemoth behind modern politics, the ruling had unquestionable influence in the 2010 election cycle, in which spending from outside groups quadrupled from 2006 levels and nearly half of all campaign donations were provided by only ten corporations, according to Public Citizen.

However, the Occupy protesters believe that it is unfair that corporations can use their wealth to buy louder voices and bigger influence in the political sphere. In a recent interview with NPR, Professor John Witt of Yale Law School summarized the protesters’ opinion that “the differences…between natural persons and metaphysical persons or corporations might be a good reason to distinguish between natural persons and corporations for purposes of regulating speech.” In the spirit of Occupy Wall Street, the one-year anniversary of theCitizens United decision sparked a flurry of small demonstrations in January 2011.

The upcoming Kiobel decision, however, could be a significant step towards restoring corporate responsibility, or a tragic step towards unchecked corporate power and rights. If corporations are to enjoy the benefits of legal personhood and equal protection, they must also be held accountable for human rights violations and other criminal acts.

When I visited Zuccotti Park, the epicenter of the Occupy protests, on Oct. 15, I saw a few signs sporting this slogan: “I’ll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.” Even though a metaphysical execution, corporations have been “executed” for violating human rights laws. A key example is IG Farben, a German chemical conglomerate which was dissolved after WWII because of its role in the Holocaust and persistent widespread corruption. IG Farben worked closely with the Nazi government to secure chemical plants in the invaded countries of Poland and Czechoslovakia during WWII. Additionally, IG Farben held the patent for Zyklon B, the chemical used in gas chambers at the Auschwitz and Majdanek concentration camps, which killed roughly 1.2 million people. At the Nuremberg trials, 13 IG Farben executives were imprisoned for the war crimes committed by their company.  A few years later, the conglomerate was forcibly split up by the Allies into four smaller companies. Although a corporation cannot literally be “executed,” the break-up of IG Farben may serve as a guide for future human rights violations committed by corporations. With the outcome of the Kiobel case, hopefully, we will see the beginning of a new era of corporate responsibility.

Filed Under: Current Events Tagged With: Corporate Accountability, Corporate Responsibility, Human Rights, International Law, Occupy Wall Street, OWS, Supreme Court, War Crimes

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tweets by @TheGoodisCenter

Welcome to The Goodis Center


Connect with Us

The Goodis Center for Research and Reform, Inc.
9405 Caroline Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20901-3043
Phone: 1(301)200-2025
Fax: 1(301)202-9730
Contact Us

Mission Statement

The Goodis Center for Research and Reform, Inc., is passionately committed to creating a world that is equitable, humane, and just. We aim to do so by fostering a better understanding of human rights... Read more...

Support Our Programs

As a small nonprofit, your support makes our programs possible.  We welcome volunteers, freelance contributors, and pro bono professionals.  Learn more about how you can get involved with The Goodis Center here.  We are also grateful for your financial support.

Newsletter

Copyright © 2021 The Goodis Center for Research and Reform, Inc. · Outreach Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in


Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, the following materials on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: curricula, training materials, informational brochures and info sheets, infographics, and interactive content.
Legal Disclaimers and Copyright Policy —Ecommerce Terms of Use — Privacy Policy